Friday, March 6, 2015  
Charts |  Futures |  Options |  Portfolio |  Weather 
 Home/Illinois Corn Growers Association
 Headline News & Commentary
 Weather Station
 Futures & Cash Prices
 Local Cash Grain Bids
 Admin Login
- DTN Headline News
Kub's Den
Wednesday, March 4, 2015 9:28AM CST

By Elaine Kub
DTN Contributing Analyst

"Will there be a battle for acres this year?" asked a woman in the front row at the conference.

"No," I replied, dismissively.

Quickly, someone in the back of the room spoke up to correct me. "Well, there's always a battle for acres. Every year."

And of course I had to backpedal. This is true. Every spring farmers must decide which species of seed they want to plant into their ground, and among the many variables in their decision is the expected final price for that crop. So, yes, every year the markets' new-crop prices can theoretically influence how much acreage gets planted. But I think what the first woman was trying to ask was: Will there be a wild, volatile push by one crop's market or the other's to noticeably change farmers' minds? That's what I think of when I think of the phrase "battle for acres" -- big movements or notable trends during the early months of a year.

And that is actually surprisingly rare.

During the month of February, the daily closing prices for new-crop futures contracts are averaged together to make a reference price used in crop insurance policies. In 2015, those prices are $4.15 for corn (down from $4.62 last year), $9.73 for soybeans (down from $11.36 last year), and $5.85 for spring wheat (down from $6.51 last year). Correspondingly, the government is guessing that planted acreage for these crops will also be down from last year.

Now during the month of March, the market can make a final "bid" to try and change farmers' minds before the seed gets purchased or before it goes in the ground. Of course, March isn't necessarily the final timeframe for such decisions; some fields will still be unplanted in early June. And these March prices don't have an insurance policy attached to them to give them any ultimate tie-in to the prices received at harvest. But between now and the March 31 release of the USDA's Prospective Plantings survey, the markets have a chance to shine by outperforming each other and attracting more planting intentions.

However, in reality, once a springtime price ratio is established, the markets tend to maintain that relationship. All that is known or believed about the relative scarcity and demand for crops in the next marketing year isn't exactly set in stone, but it's not very likely to change, either. The South American crops are pretty well made; the domestic demand trends are pretty well understood.

I looked at the past 10 years of new-crop soybean and corn market behavior during the month of March and found relatively few examples when the "battle for acres" got exciting in that timeframe. For your reference, the 10-year average for the soybean-to-corn price ratio is now 2.48-to-1. After this February's new-crop prices were averaged, it looks like the soybean market is only offering farmers a slightly underpriced 2.35-to-1 ratio, although that may be enough to win some acres away from corn if a farmer is attracted by soybeans' lower input costs or is more confident of their yield.

I calculated similar ratios for the February new-crop price averages from each of the past 10 years (see the past five below), and then compared those numbers to the soybean-to-corn price ratio a month later, right before the annual Prospective Plantings report was released.

Of course it depends on what was going on in the world at the time -- which crop was scarce, did it look like planting would be delayed by weather, etc. -- but generally through the month of March, the ratio stayed pretty close to where it ended in February. If it changed, it tended to revert closer to the expected average ratio. Five times in the past 10 years, the ratio moved closer to normal by the end of March. The most notable example was 2012:

2010 Feb ave: 2.32-to-1 3/30/2010: 2.41-to-1
2011 Feb ave: 2.24-to-1 3/30/2011: 2.29-to-1
2012 Feb ave: 2.21-to-1 3/29/2012: 2.49-to-1
2013 Feb ave: 2.28-to-1 3/27/2013: 2.24-to-1
2014 Feb ave: 2.46-to-1 3/28/2014: 2.44-to-1
2015 Feb ave: 2.35-to-1 3/30/2015: ?

So the most likely outcome for 3/30/15 is to move closer to normal. That is to say, for soybeans to gain relatively more or lose relatively less in price than corn. Soybeans don't typically go from underpriced in February to overpriced by the end of March, so let's say the upper limit will be 2.48-to-1. That could look like $10.29 for November soybean futures, if December corn futures stay still at $4.15. Or it could look like $3.95 for December corn futures if November soybean futures stay still at $9.81.

Three times in the past 10 years, soybeans have gone from underpriced in February to more underpriced by end of March. For instance, in 2009 the ratio itself dropped 7% by the end of March. So, let's say the lower limit will be 2.18-to-1, which could manifest itself as $9.04 November soybeans if December corn stays at $4.15. Or it could look like $4.50 December corn, with November soybeans still at $9.81.

Yes, there will be some sort of competition between the corn market, the soybean market, the wheat market, the sunflower market, the canola market, the alfalfa market, and the markets for any other crop that can be planted into the ground this spring. But whether that competition can be characterized as a "battle" or not -- maybe more of a skirmish? -- will play out day by day.

Elaine Kub is the author of "Mastering the Grain Markets: How Profits Are Really Made" and can be reached at or on Twitter @elainekub.


blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
DTN Market Matters Blog
Katie Micik
Markets Editor
Monday, March 2, 2015 6:09PM CST
Monday, February 23, 2015 7:35PM CST
Monday, February 16, 2015 4:42PM CST
Technically Speaking
Darin Newsom
DTN Senior Analyst
Monday, March 2, 2015 2:02PM CST
Sunday, March 1, 2015 2:22PM CST
Sunday, March 1, 2015 1:47PM CST
Fundamentally Speaking
Joel Karlin
DTN Contributing Analyst
Monday, March 2, 2015 3:49PM CST
Wednesday, February 25, 2015 3:56PM CST
Wednesday, February 18, 2015 3:54PM CST
DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor
Wednesday, March 4, 2015 10:36PM CST
Tuesday, March 3, 2015 8:09PM CST
Friday, February 27, 2015 5:15AM CST
Minding Ag's Business
Marcia Taylor
DTN Executive Editor
Tuesday, March 3, 2015 7:55PM CST
Thursday, February 19, 2015 5:21PM CST
Thursday, February 12, 2015 9:48PM CST
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Thursday, March 5, 2015 5:54PM CST
Wednesday, March 4, 2015 12:38AM CST
Friday, February 27, 2015 7:41PM CST
Thursday, March 5, 2015 11:26PM CST
Wednesday, March 4, 2015 7:04PM CST
Wednesday, March 4, 2015 6:11PM CST
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Monday, February 23, 2015 6:43PM CST
Wednesday, February 11, 2015 7:25PM CST
Tuesday, January 13, 2015 4:19PM CST
Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington
DTN Livestock Analyst
Friday, February 27, 2015 9:05PM CST
Friday, February 20, 2015 5:15PM CST
Wednesday, February 4, 2015 10:41PM CST
South America Calling
Alastair Stewart
South America Correspondent
Thursday, March 5, 2015 4:48PM CST
Monday, March 2, 2015 12:49PM CST
Thursday, February 26, 2015 11:21PM CST
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Monday, March 2, 2015 1:00PM CST
Monday, February 23, 2015 11:26PM CST
Monday, February 16, 2015 1:29PM CST
Machinery Chatter
Jim Patrico
Progressive Farmer Senior Editor
Monday, March 2, 2015 6:50PM CST
Monday, February 23, 2015 10:01PM CST
Tuesday, February 17, 2015 5:18PM CST
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Thursday, March 5, 2015 11:17PM CST
Wednesday, March 4, 2015 11:27PM CST
Tuesday, March 3, 2015 10:52PM CST
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Thursday, February 19, 2015 8:58PM CST
Tuesday, January 6, 2015 4:51PM CST
Thursday, December 4, 2014 6:34PM CST
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN